Facebook Instagram LinkedIn YouTube TikTok

Vacancy Starts Before the Unit Is Empty

By Cynthia Trammell

When most investors think about vacancy, they picture an empty apartment.

The resident has moved out. The keys are back. Maintenance is walking the unit, someone is figuring out paint and flooring, and the clock has officially started.

I look at vacancy a little differently.

Sometimes vacancy starts months before the resident ever packs a box.

It can begin with a maintenance request that sits too long. A renewal that nobody follows up on. A resident who has been paying below market and suddenly receives an increase without anyone considering how the conversation should happen. It can grow from a property that looks neglected or from small frustrations that keep stacking up until leaving feels easier than staying.

By the time the apartment is empty, you may only be seeing the final result.

That is why I do not think vacancy should be treated simply as a leasing problem.

It is an operations problem.

The Empty Unit Is the Part You Can See

An empty apartment is easy to measure.

You know the rent that is no longer coming in. You can see the turn costs. You know someone needs to clean it, repair it, advertise it, show it, approve another resident, and get the new lease signed.

What is harder to see is everything that happened before move out.

Maybe the resident had already decided six weeks earlier that they were leaving.

Perhaps the renewal offer went out too late.

A maintenance problem may have been fixed, but only after the resident called three times.

The landscaping could have slowly deteriorated. Trash may have been sitting where it should not. A neighboring resident could be creating problems that nobody addressed.

None of those things appear on a rent roll as “future vacancy.”

That does not mean they are not affecting the property.

Not Every Move Out Is a Failure

Residents move.

They buy houses. Their job changes. Families grow. Relationships change. They move closer to work or family. Sometimes they simply want something different.

You are never going to eliminate turnover, and I would not build a business plan pretending you can.

The better question is whether you are creating turnover you could have prevented.

That requires more than looking at the vacancy percentage once a month.

I want to understand why people are leaving.

If five residents move out over several months and all five had completely different life circumstances, that tells me one thing.

If several residents mention the same maintenance issue, communication problem, condition of the property, or concern about value, I am paying attention.

Patterns matter.

A single complaint can be noise. Several similar complaints may be information about the business.

That is an important distinction in [Small Multifamily Investing](INTERNAL LINK: Small Multifamily Investing) because smaller properties give us the opportunity to know much more about what is happening inside the asset.

We should use that advantage.

Sometimes the Most Profitable Unit Is the One You Never Have to Turn

Investors love talking about rent increases.

I understand why. When we buy a property with rents below the market, increasing income can be an important part of the business plan.

But there is another side to that equation.

What does it cost if the resident leaves?

Now you may have lost rent during the vacancy. There can be cleaning, repairs, paint, flooring, marketing, leasing expenses, staff time, and the possibility that the unit sits longer than expected.

That does not mean you should never raise rents.

It means the decision deserves more thought than, “Market rent is $150 higher, so raise everyone $150.”

A good operator looks at the entire picture.

What is the resident currently paying? How long have they lived there? What condition is the unit in? How reliable have they been? What would it cost to turn that apartment? How strong is demand right now? Is the current rent truly below what comparable properties are achieving, or are you comparing your property to something the resident would consider meaningfully better?

This is where [Real Estate Deal Analysis](INTERNAL LINK: Real Estate Deal Analysis) continues after closing.

We often think analysis belongs to acquisition.

It does not.

Owners are analyzing decisions for as long as they own the property.

A Renewal Is a Business Decision, Not an Automatic Letter

One of the easiest places for operations to become mechanical is renewals.

A lease is coming up. The system generates a notice. Someone inserts the new rent. The resident either signs or they do not.

There are times when that process works perfectly well.

There are also situations where I want more thought behind it.

Imagine a resident who has lived in the property for several years, pays consistently, takes care of the apartment, and rarely creates problems. Their rent is below market.

There is probably room for an increase.

But how much?

I would rather make that decision knowing what replacing that resident might cost than simply chase the highest possible rent because a comparable apartment is advertised at that number.

The answer will not be identical for every property or every resident.

That is the point.

Operations requires judgment.

Your spreadsheet may tell you what happens if every unit reaches a certain rent. It cannot tell you whether pushing a particular resident to that number today is the best decision for the business.

That part belongs to the owner and management team.

Resident Experience Is Not About Making Everyone Happy

Whenever I talk about paying attention to residents, I do not mean giving everyone whatever they ask for.

You are still running a business.

There will be requests you say no to. Rent still has to be collected. Leases still matter. Policies have to be enforced. Some residents will be unhappy no matter how well the property is operated.

Resident experience is not about becoming afraid to make business decisions.

For me, it is much simpler.

Does the property do what we said it would do?

When something breaks, is there a reasonable process for addressing it?

Can residents get an answer?

Does the property look cared for?

Are expectations understandable?

Do we know when the same complaint keeps appearing?

A Class C property does not need marble countertops and a resort pool to be a place someone wants to continue living.

Sometimes people simply want clean, functional, safe housing where management does what it says it will do.

That may not look exciting in an offering memorandum.

It matters tremendously in operations.

Slow Turns Can Turn One Vacancy Into Two Problems

There is another side of vacancy that deserves just as much attention.

Once the resident does leave, how quickly do you know what happens next?

I am amazed by how easily an empty unit can disappear into the background of a property.

Someone needs to inspect it.

Then a bid is needed.

Materials have to be ordered.

A contractor says they will be there Tuesday.

Tuesday becomes Thursday.

Thursday becomes next week.

Eventually the unit is ready, but no one has taken pictures yet.

Another few days disappear before marketing begins.

No individual delay feels catastrophic.

Stack enough of them together and you have lost weeks.

That is why [Multifamily Investing Training](INTERNAL LINK: Multifamily Investing Training) should include operations, not just acquisitions and underwriting.

A beautiful acquisition model cannot compensate forever for weak execution.

The property only earns rent when someone is actually paying to live there.

Look at Your Next 90 Days Before They Arrive

Here is a simple test I would run if you already own a multifamily property.

Pull your rent roll and look at every lease expiring during the next 90 days.

Do not just count them.

Look at them.

Which residents are likely renewal candidates?

Where are current rents compared with realistic market rents?

Are several leases expiring in the same month?

Do any residents have unresolved maintenance concerns?

Which units would require significant work if they became vacant?

Have renewal conversations started soon enough for you to make decisions instead of reacting to them?

You are not trying to predict exactly who will leave.

You are trying to stop treating vacancy as something that appears without warning.

Then look backward.

Review your most recent move outs and ask why they happened.

Not the code entered into the property management software.

The actual reason.

You may discover there was nothing you could have done differently.

That is useful information too.

But you may also find a pattern you would never see by looking only at occupancy.

Operations Gives You Time

This is one of the reasons I care so much about the operating side of real estate.

Acquisition gets attention because buying a property is exciting.

Operations is quieter.

There is rarely a photograph of the owner reviewing lease expirations three months ahead or asking why a maintenance item keeps showing up. Nobody celebrates the unit that never went vacant because a problem was addressed before the resident decided to leave.

Yet those decisions accumulate.

So do the decisions we fail to make.

[Financial Freedom Through Multifamily Investing](INTERNAL LINK: Financial Freedom Through Multifamily Investing) is built from more than finding the right property and negotiating the right purchase price. Ownership becomes valuable when the business continues to deserve the assumptions we made about it.

An empty apartment gets everyone’s attention.

A resident quietly deciding not to renew usually does not.

By the time the keys are sitting on the manager’s desk, that decision may already be weeks old.

Good operations give you the chance to notice sooner.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *